It is just a question of time before the debate shifts to the “root cause” of the strife in the alarmingly large number of districts that the Maoist extreme left wing terrorists control. The official figure for the number of districts under Maoist influence is 200 but actually it is much more than that. We’re living in denial as usual although that isn’t going to change the ground realities or the root causes of the disquiet. So what are the root causes? Hunger? Grinding poverty? State apathy? Complete absence of governance in the countryside? Apparently, they are. Now, isn’t it already over 6 decades that this has pretty much been the state of affairs?
Now, if this is the scenario at the top of the district administration what should be expected at levels further down at the sub-divisional and block levels? So, is it any wonder that no governance worth the name ever reached the dirt poor folks who are staking their lives to protect the Maoist terrorists today? I’m not saying even for a moment that everything will start working well immediately after an overhaul of the district administrative structure. It might not, for all we know but if we have a proper democratic structure in the districts as in the union and the states, then true accountability emerges and deals with the rest, especially non-performance. People then have the option of replying democratically to misrule and not fall into the trap of the totalitarian monsters like the Maoist terrorists.
In fact, that was the sentiment of the 2nd ARC (Administrative Reforms Commission) which had the good sense to suggest that the office of the district collector has to make way for an elected district mayor who will be accountable to a composite district legislature or a district council. Accountability in governance from the district level downward is not possible without this democratic decentralization and delivering NREGA and other worthwhile government programmes without an accountability mechanism will just remain a pipe dream. The Maoist problem has only added urgency for the recommendations of the 2nd ARC with respect to district governance, to be implemented without any further delay. The question is, who will bell the cat?